- DOES A RAW IMAGE CONVERT TO JPEG STILL RETAIN RAW INFO ARCHIVE
- DOES A RAW IMAGE CONVERT TO JPEG STILL RETAIN RAW INFO PLUS
- DOES A RAW IMAGE CONVERT TO JPEG STILL RETAIN RAW INFO PROFESSIONAL
The upshot is that of course it's possible, but there is no in-built mechanism for doing this. I started a thread on the subject of keeping RAWs as JPGs, and there was a little disagreement there too. DVDs are far more expensive than hard drives and infinitely less useful.Īnyway, regardless of the above, each photographer chooses his or her personal working method and this forum should jolly well be about helping each other achieve what *they want* to achieve, not chiming in and telling them that their way of doing things is a bad idea. But Imagemagick is even a scripting /programming language. convert -list format grep Canon CR2 DNG r- Canon Digital Camera Raw Image Format CRW DNG r- Canon Digital Camera Raw Image Format. I may still not want to keep the dud images, but there's a hell of a lot of stuff I can keep by archiving parts of shoots off to JPG, and it's useful for informational purposes. So it can do the opposite of what the OP is searching for: to convert RAW to whatever. In my case a JPG can be configured to take up 1/40th of the space of a RAW. However, completely deleting RAWs (aka "The Cull") seems senseless when there's a really decent trade-off: the JPG. Choosing which images to archive, in my opinion, works under this same principle. They will thank you for making quick decisions about what is good and what isn't, and presenting that to them. In most cases your clients will not thank you for keeping hold of the second-best images, the dud shots where lighting didn't fire, the test / setup images. The actual JPEG conversion is done in the.
DOES A RAW IMAGE CONVERT TO JPEG STILL RETAIN RAW INFO ARCHIVE
Despite my insistence that the security and long term archive of my clients' images is important, I am a firm believer in getting rid of unwanted crap. JPEG to RAW AI is a program that aims to do the seemingly impossible task of recovering lost picture quality and details from JPEG image formats.
* yes, all those adjectives had different meanings
DOES A RAW IMAGE CONVERT TO JPEG STILL RETAIN RAW INFO PROFESSIONAL
However, this is not how a professional operates. Sure, if you are going to mess around with silly external USB hard drives and their unreliable interfaces, unreliable resilience, their susceptibility to data loss in the long term, and the fact you will undoubtedly end-up with a hotch-potch of different drives with different capacities, each storing various spanned parts of a master catalog. Forget the 8x 2TB drives, that's the least of my costs.
DOES A RAW IMAGE CONVERT TO JPEG STILL RETAIN RAW INFO PLUS
I have just finished designing my own personal storage system that makes good use of what I already have plus room for serious expansion, that is of a standard I consider to be suitable for storage and archive of my clients' work in the longer term, and I'm telling you it's not cheap. Not if you insist on a centralised, consolidated, always accessible, resilient, network attached storage solution* with multiple RAID levels to cater for different data storage (slow and capacious with lower redundancy for archive, faster and higher redundancy level for current projects), with ample capacity and insist on RAID1 for the high redundancy stuff.
0 kommentar(er)
